舒淇

曾一脱成名，多次获得国内外影视大奖，舒淇是影圈成就最高的脱星

6月9日，女星舒淇带着她的作品《寻她》现身上海国际电影节，而她上一部作品还是2019年那部让顶流鹿晗被嘲上天的《上海堡垒》，这也意味着大家已经4年时间没有在大荧幕上见到舒淇了。而此次她带着《寻她》亮相上影节，并且还是上影节主竞赛单元金爵奖有三部入围中国影片之一，因此也是引得无数媒体关注。

此次上影节三部入围金爵奖的影片，除了舒淇《寻她》之外，其他两部影片都是女星齐溪，但是有时不是数量决定成败的。据了解，舒淇在《寻她》中演绎了一名乡村母亲，她完美诠释了一位在面对周遭的现实纠葛时，坚定自我并勇敢走出困难、完成自我觉醒和成长的女性。因此依儒爷来看，此次金爵奖获奖的机会要比齐溪要大得多，这也代表着舒淇时隔四年再度回归，这是直接奔着拿奖来的。

今年47岁的舒淇应该是这么多年以来，风月片中成就最高的女星了。众所周知，早年舒淇家境贫寒，她读书到中学时，因家境窘迫而停止学业。16岁签约台湾巴比伦公司做模特和广告女郎，也是在那时她出了写真集。而因为写真的发行，有导演看中了她，找她去拍了风月片《灵与欲》，原名林立慧的舒淇就这样走入了电影圈。

而因为《灵与欲》的大卖，舒淇接连拍了多部风月片，像《之玉女心经》《红灯区》以及让舒淇拿下首个影视奖项--金像奖最佳女配角和最佳新人奖的《男女》，全都是那段时间拍摄的。而当时拿下这个金像最佳女配角奖的舒淇才20岁。

因为拿奖了，也代表在电影圈有一定的地位了，所以舒淇开始考虑转型，尝试要从风月片中解脱出来，并且喊话表示“当年脱掉的衣服，我会一件一件把它穿回来”。不可否认，虽然当年喊出这话的舒淇真的很狂，但她真的做到了。

在1996到2001的这6年间，舒淇总共拍摄了45部电影，从当年的风月女星一跃成为影视圈当红女星。而这40多部影视作品，也是让她直接拿下了3个金像奖最佳女配、2个金紫荆奖最佳女配，以及1个金马奖最佳女配。而这时已经没有人再提及她是凭风月片出道的女星了。

在这些年里，因为舒淇的人格魅力以及性格原因，她结交了很多圈内朋友，而与其合作过的艺人都对其大赞有加。周星驰、冯小刚这些圈中以脾气古怪著称的导演，都纷纷赞舒淇是圈内少有的好演员，而曾经一举终结四大天王时代的谢霆锋更直接表示：“舒淇是唯一一个能让我去买票看港片的女演员。”

因为时间和人脉的积累，舒淇的圈内资源也越来越好，很多好的剧本也纷纷向其伸出了橄榄枝。在2005年，凭借和张震主演的爱情电影《最好的时光》一举拿下了第42届金马奖最佳女主角的奖杯，这年也刚好是舒淇从影第10年。拿下影后的舒淇，花了10年时间，终于将其之前拍风月片脱掉的衣服，一件件穿了回去。

有人曾经问过舒淇“对自己年轻时的选择可曾后悔过”，而舒淇则笑着说：“不后悔，都是自己的选择，都是一段经历”。看得出来，这些年舒淇成长了很多，相信如果是现在，她肯定不会再放出当年的那种豪言壮语了。

而在2005年首次拿下影后荣誉后，舒淇的影视作品又多次受到国内外的影视大奖的肯定，并且还多次被戛纳电影节的金棕榈奖认可。而由她主演的《非诚勿扰》《西游降魔篇》《寻龙诀》等多部电影，更是多次拿下票房冠军。

舒淇不仅仅影视作品成就非凡，她的红毯也是备受大家认可。舒淇并不是传统审美中五官精致的美人，方脸，宽眼距，塌鼻梁…然而，她自信从容的松弛感，却将自己的长相演绎成为了一种不可复制的高级美感。儒爷也已经记不住她有多少次因为美上了热搜，而还曾有媒体称她是中国的安吉丽娜·朱丽。

舒淇可以说是时尚的象征。她的各种造型，从时尚和现代到经典和简约。无论她穿什么，她总是性感却不失优雅与从容。而舒淇对于“松弛感”的把控也是极其精准的，体态松弛而不“垮”，舒适随性却不让人感到懒散，这让她无论穿任何风格的衣服都能显得自然得体。灿烂自然的笑容更散发着她的自信和活力。舒淇美艳而慵懒自如的状态让人直呼羡慕。

舒淇的故事告诉我们，无论当年的起点有多不堪，遇到过多少困难和挫折，只要我们勇敢地面对，坚持不懈地努力，最终都能够取得成功。

Guancha's Interview with Mbeki: Africa's Experience on War and Development

Africa, humanity's oldest home, has, over the past few decades, been frequently cited as the \"next big growth story\". Unfortunately, those hopes have been consistently dashed; in fact, Subsaharan Africa's GDP per capita has seen almost no net growth since the 1970s.

South Africa is emblematic of Africa's potential, as well as its challenges. Amongst all African countries with populations over 10 million, it has the highest GDP per capita. Unfortunately, it has also seen zero net growth since 2008, and has been beset by issues such as the AIDS epidemic, high inequality and water shortages.

In order to overcome current challenges facing Africa, South Africa's former President Thabo Mbeki strongly promoted the concept of \"African Renaissance\", which calls for a cultural, scientific, and economic renewal across the continent. He has been a strong advocate for the cooperation amongst countries in the Global South, which he continues to do today as the Chairman of the South Centre.

Guancha's interview with Mr Mbeki

Guancha recently sat down with Mr Mbeki for an interview on these topics, as well as his views on the Sudan conflict, the Ukraine War and Nelson Mandela's legacy. Below is a lightly edited version of this interview:

Guancha: Mr Mbeki, you have been a champion of South-South cooperation and an “African Renaissance”. What are the greatest challenges to this vision, especially in Africa?

Thabo Mbeki: When the South-South cooperation process was visualized, and where we are today, the challenge still remains that, for the countries of the south to succeed, they must succeed together, they must act together, because there are all of these issues that need to be addressed. If, for instance, you look at the Sustainable Development Goals that we must achieve by 2030, and nobody must be left behind; the people who would be left behind, if anybody is going to be left behind, are from countries of the South. And in order to ensure that doesn't happen, we need that South-South cooperation.

So that's a continuing challenge. It's related to the matter you were raising of an African renaissance, a rebirth of the continent, because all of the legacy of the past, legacies of slavery, legacy of colonialism remains, that legacy remains on the continent. You need to overcome that, which means addressing matters of under-development, matters of poverty, matters of internationally marginalization. Those challenges remain. The African renaissance has got to address all of those issues. Africa's renaissance would contribute to the same matter of South-South cooperation.

Guancha: A specific example of the challenges that African renaissance faces would be the conflict in Sudan. How do you think this can be resolved?

Thabo Mbeki:There's a specific current matter of the conflict that's going on between two state formations, these armed groups, the Sudan armed forces and the (Rapid) Support Forces. They are both official organs of state. The first thing to do then is to address the concerns of the civilian population, because the conflict has resulted in disaster for the civilians. Reportedly, the capital city Khartoum, where a lot of the conflict is taking place, is running out of water. So a humanitarian ceasefire is very important, so that the needs of the civilian population can then get addressed. That's the first step.

The ongoing conflict in Khartoum, Sudan (PHOTO/VCG)

The second step of course is to address the conflict itself, which has to do in part with effecting a security sector reform. It's an old problem of Sudan, has come with Sudan over the years, but we need to reform the security sector, and the matter has been raised correctly that you should not have the two armed formations. The Rapid Support Forces must be integrated with the Sudanese armed forces. That matter has to be done, but it requires a negotiation among the armed forces, but that will follow after this matter about humanitarian assistance has been addressed. Altogether, you then have to come to this matter of the democratization of Sudan, a negotiated process in Sudan, which must address the establishment of Sudan as a democratic country, which this transitional process since the removal of president Bashir has been about. We must go back to that. But it requires a ceasefire in the first instance.

Guancha: Do you think this reflects broader challenges with Africa's development or just specific issues with Sudan?

Thabo Mbeki: It's a specific matter regarding Sudan, there's no other African country which has got two official armies.

Guancha: But recently, a number of Sahel countries have seen military coups and attempted military coups, for example, Burkina faso, Mali, etc. On military usurping civilian government, there does seem to be a broader pattern.

Thabo Mbeki: You've got a challenge on the continent. It's also facing Sudan, this democratization matter, (and) the countries you mention, whether it's Mali, Niger or Burkina Faso and so on. The matter that arises out of these military coups is that we have not established stable democratic systems. The African Union has got all manner of policy positions on the same question. It means the continent must then act decisively to implement what are already established positions about the democratization of the continent. And the African union must lend its weight to each of these African countries to implement existing policies of the African union on the matter of democracy, so that we don't have military coups and all of that.

Guancha: Your successor as South Africa's president, Mr Zuma, building on the foreign policy foundation that you had laid, formally joined BRICS in 2011. As two institutions both focused on promoting the interest of developing countries and the global south, how should the work of BRICS and the South Centre intersect and interact in your view?

Thabo Mbeki:The South Centre is a is a resource center for the countries of the south, in a sense a think tank of the countries of the South, to be able to make and elaborate the positions that countries of the south should take mainly in their interaction and negotiations within, for instance, the UN context, whether it's trade matters or intellectual property or human rights issues. The South Centre is that kind of resource center, to feed into the countries of the South, as they engage these negotiations with the WTO, WHO globally. It's a specific role to the South Centre and a very important role.

BRICS addresses same questions on a practical basis. For instance, you have the BRICS bank (New Development Bank, NDB), which has got a particular mandate which countries of the South can access and do access for their development purposes. That kind of experience needs to feed into the South Centre, that our experiences with regards to meeting these development processes from our own banks as exemplified by the BRICS bank’s experience.

The South Centre, for its own purposes, needs to be watching very closely what BRICS is doing in order to feed the positive experiences of BRICS into the rest of the countries of the South. So that connection is important.

Dilma Rousseff takes office as the new President of the NDB in Shanghai, China on April 13, 2023. (PHOTO / AFP)

Guancha: South Africa has consistently voted to abstain in numerous UN resolutions on the War in Ukraine, and was criticized by Western media and governments for it. What is the reason for South Africa’s abstain vote? What is your view of this conflict?

Thabo Mbeki: I think the position that the South African government has taken is correct. There's a war that's going on between Russia and Ukraine. It's an African experience: when a conflict breaks out in any African country, like Sudan, the first thing that we do as Africans is to say, stop the guns, stop shooting, so that we can then look at the matter, what caused the shooting, find a solution. We never ever on the continent start those processes by blaming one side or the other. There is a conflict to be resolved. And you don't start off by saying, no, you are wrong and you are right. We start with saying let's stop the shooting. It's in the course of the negotiations that we discuss the matter of what was wrong, what was right, what should be done, what should not be done. It's in a sense instinctive. What South Africa says with regards to Russia and Ukraine, it has said with every conflict on the African continent. Stop the fighting. Let's bring about peace. The matter of attributing blame for that comes later.

Guancha: You were the primary mediator in the conflict between Zimbabwe’s governing ZANU-PF and the opposition, and what was known as the “quiet diplomacy”. What were the most important guiding principles of your approach? Do you think similar thinking could be applied to resolve the international conflict between Russia and Ukraine?

Thabo Mbeki:Zimbabwe's got serious problems: political, economic (etc). And the way to solve those problems is to get the Zimbabweans themselves to engage one another, to define the future of their country. So our task, facilitate the Zimbabwe negotiations, was to make sure that the government and the opposition, they get together, between them identify what the problems are, and together find a solution. That's the only way you are going to find a permanent solution. South Africa cannot come from the outside and say, Zimbabweans, sit together and we are going to tell you how to solve your problems. That agreement would never last. You need an agreement from the belligerents. That's why the conflict in Ukraine has got to be dealt with in the same way, it’s not going to be resolved by a use of force, it's got to be resolved by the Russians and the Ukrainians and other people concerned, like the Americans, sitting together and saying, what is it that caused this war? What's the problem? How do you resolve it? And so the belligerents, together with whoever else, they must be the ones to produce a solution. That is what is necessary with regards to the conflict in Europe.

Guancha: China has recently published a twelve points plan outlining how to move towards peace in Ukraine. Do you think this might be a good starting approach for peace? What is your view of this?

Thabo Mbeki:It’s a very good starting point. And nobody should be requiring that the People's republic of China should say anything which suggests a commitment, more support from one side or the other. But to say we need to stop this conflict, why don't we follow this basis at the start? I think it's correct. And I think actually China would be a very good facilitator of a process like that. But I think some people are politicizing this matter, in this sense of requirement China to take sides. No, China is saying that we need to stop this war. We've got certain proposals to make to the belligerents. Let's take that route. And I think that is correct.

Guancha: Recently, there has been increased talk of decoupling and confrontation on the global stage. Key to this seems to be America's desire to see all countries adapt a more Western model of democracy, while China believes that development is the most important democratic right. What do you think of these narratives?

Thabo Mbeki: I think the current discussion, which has emerged very sharply, is this issue of multipolarity versus unipolarity, multilateralism vessels unilateralism. And clearly what is correct, is a multipolar approach, multilateral approach, which means therefore that nobody should be able to dictate from a unipolar position what the rest of the world should be doing. The world has got to develop, take different paths of development, because China will have a particular perspective about what it needs to do to develop. And another country may have a different point of view. That's got to be allowed. So I'm saying that at the center of it, is a need for the whole world, including the US, China, Russia, South Africa, everybody, to recognize this reality that we want a world that is governed on a multilateral basis and on a multipolar basis. If we can get all of that together, then it would be possible to achieve global stability and a shared perspective about the future of the world, of the globe. I think that is centrally what we need to do.

Guancha: This had also been emphasized by your predecessor, former President Nelson Mandela. You had previously been his Deputy President. What do you think are some aspects of Mandela that aren't so widely known? And given that South Africa's recent economic growth has been disappointing, with GDP per capita essentially flat since you left office, some have tried to pin the blame on Mandela. What do you think? How do you think he should be remembered by us all?

Thabo Mbeki: I think the way that people speak about Mandela is largely correct. This was a leading liberation fighter, for the liberation of South Africa from apartheid and all that. That's why he ended up in jail for 27 years, never broke, never surrendered. He’s an outstanding figure for liberation, was quite correct, together with ANC, to say South Africa has got a proportionally very large minority population who are settlers. If you look at the history of the continent, Algeria had a very big French settler population. At independence, they all left and went back to France. Look at the Portuguese colonies, Angola, Mozambique, the Portuguese left and went back to Portugal. Or the English from Kenya.

Mandela at Mbeki's 1999 presidential inauguration (PHOTO/AFP)

But in South Africa, no, they are not going anywhere. Those white original settler population, they’re South Africans. And therefore the issue arises in South Africa of this national reconciliation. People had been oppressed and oppressed, but they are citizens of one country. How should they live together? And I'm saying Nelson Mandela played a very important part in the process of addressing that particular challenge, which is very South African. And out of that situation of conflict and division, you still have to build that democracy which belongs to all the people of South Africa. And again, Nelson Mandela was a front line figure in that context.

The South African economy is in bad shape, as you indicate. It has nothing to do with Mandela, it has to do with the history of South Africa, its related to that same process of national reconciliation, because the effect is that the wealth of the country was and is in the hands of the people that colonize us. So they control the economy, the black population contains the politics. Now, what is it that you need to do? You need to get these people who control the wealth to have the same commitment to the future of the country as the black people who control the politics. That's been that disjuncture. For many years after South Africa's democratization, a lot of the capitalist class, which is white, had no confidence in the future of South Africa. And therefore they didn't want to invest, because (they’re worried) tomorrow is going to be bad.

Fundamental to it, it's the history. The history of South Africa produces dichotomy of white wealth, decision about the economy being very much in the hand of the whites, and investment you need in the economy was also in white hands. So we need to persuade them, you have a responsibility as South African citizens to invest in your own national economy, instead of saying you're afraid of the future. That's what lies at the center of the economic crisis. There is a changed atmosphere in the country, such that the owners of wealth are now saying were ready to invest in the South African economy. (The poor economic situation has) Nothing to do with Nelson Mandela, it’s the history of South Africa.

Interviewer: Jersey Lee

本文系观察者网独家稿件，文章内容纯属作者个人观点，不代表平台观点，未经授权，不得转载，否则将追究法律责任。关注观察者网微信guanchacn，每日阅读趣味文章。

舒淇的“成名”过程不简单呀

作者：青衫到白衣

前段时间舒淇的广告大片在网上流传，一袭红衣黑色手套和马丁靴，黑红永是经典，复古又不会过时，这组照片里舒淇美的不可方物。

说起舒淇，你们可能最先想到的就是她早期的影片，说她靠“”走红之类，但是对于舒淇来说，那是她是成长的始端。

她出道这么多年，即使已经四十多岁，但是她依旧是有资本让人为之倾倒，她的美不在皮而在骨。

舒淇出现在观众面前一直都是一个笑呵呵的样子，不管是上综艺节目还是怎样，但其实，她也有一段心酸的过去。

【小女孩“长大”之前】

舒淇曾经是“林立慧”。

她出生于1976年的台湾新北，她家里面的生活条件并不是很好，一家人的月收入只有父亲的微薄工资，母亲专职在家照顾幼小的她，三个人勉强度日。

那个年代的家庭，多少会有点重男轻女，幼小的她并没有获得多少的关爱，更不要说是在几年之后，家中有了一个能够让父亲和母亲欢喜的弟弟。

林立慧稍有违背父母意愿的迹象，就会遭受到“毒打”，稍微长大了些会躲了，再然后就会跑出家里去逃避，跑出去很久，父母都不会出来寻找她。

从小最期待的一件事，就是希望有一天可以脱离自己的父母，成为一个大人。

小时候她在家就不受家中的重视，可以说是“放养”长大的林丽慧“无所不能”，小小年纪就学会喝酒，抽烟，甚至于还会打架。

十六岁那年，是林立慧惯有跑出的一天，那天和平常没有什么两样，但是好像又有所不同。

那天父母又要打她，然后她就跑出了家门，跑到了台中，那个时候的林立慧感觉自己大了可以养活自己，她就决定找工作。

她做过不少的工作，在酒吧做过吧女，也做过招待员，也做过售货员，微薄的工资还是可以养活她自己，也许是因为舒淇心中有着更大的梦想，也是因为她自身条件优越，她成为了台湾巴比伦公司的一员。

她按照公司安排的时间，去拍广告等等。

也许真的是因为想要改变自己穷苦的命运，她听从公司，去拍了大尺度的照片，于是，就有了“书琪”。

她不想用自己的真名，用这样的方式让别人知道自己。

【“舒淇”早期的“电影人生” 】

1995年舒淇十九岁，那个时候她被柯俊雄看中，成为了他旗下的一名艺人，当时，柯俊雄在台湾的电影界还是有一定的地位的，他的话书琪也并没有考虑太多，就相信了。他说会给舒淇拍摄六部电影。

那个时候的书淇还不知道，她的以后的很长一段时间了，抛不开这几部电影带给她的影响。

那年要拍摄《灵与欲》，也许是因为看到舒淇年轻貌美，柯俊雄决定亲自“上阵”，并且还主动要求加入了很多大尺度的动作，这部电视是舒淇的第一部电影，也为接下来她的“电影人生”奠定了基础。

电影上映后，很多人说什么“假戏真做”，也许这些话对她造成了不小的影响。

后来舒淇的照片和电影演王晶看见，他觉得舒淇是与众不同的，于是就找到了舒淇。

一番商谈之后，舒淇决定抛下台湾的一切转战港圈。当时舒淇还有些犹豫，一样是拍电影为什么要到港圈？

也许是王晶的“性感，但不外漏”的条件打动了她，并且还要给弟弟挣学费，给奶奶挣医药费，于是就决定，跟随王晶到香港发展，虽然当时书琪和柯俊雄还有合约，但是因为书琪当时还没有成年，所以就没有所谓的违约。

当时舒淇走的时候，还带着很多人的“不看好”，感觉她在这条路上，并不能走太远。

舒淇在港圈的发展并不是很好，其中语言就是很大的一个难题，没有钱去找老师学习，只有一个人对着电视练习粤语。

一段时间之后，她便能够正常的交流。也许是因为惜才，王晶和他的妻子对舒淇很是照顾，后来文隽成为了舒淇的经纪人，在事业上给予她帮助。

在港圈出道之后，“书琪”成为了“舒淇”。

后来，舒淇接连拍摄了电影《玉蒲扇之玉女心经》，舒淇的电影被很多人称为是“风月片，”虽然是“风月片”，但是不得不承认舒淇红了，后来的她被大家称为“性感女神”。

【舒淇将衣服“穿”了回去】

说起舒淇，很多时候大家想到的都是她的电影，都是性感。

这些也给她带来了很多困扰，首先就是社会上一些人对她的不尊重，还会用有色眼镜看待她。

有的时候，她站在路上等人，有人看到她就会对她指指点点，喊：“脱星”。

她在1996年和张国荣合作的一部电影《男女》，说出了她的心声：“你口口声声说不想拍，你知不知道，演的那更难受”。

而她也凭借这部影片，拿了含金量很高的奖项。

可能是这些言语对她伤害真的很大，她动起了想要把衣服穿回去的心思，好在王晶一直很支持舒淇的发展。

舒淇一直在不停的拍戏，希望能够给自己、给家人更好的生活，来到香港之后的那三年，舒淇的作品，高达十几部。

1998年的一部《古惑仔情义篇之洪兴十三妹》让她获得了金像奖和金马奖的“最佳女配角奖”，这是她不拍摄“风月片”获得奖项的第一部电影，可以说意义重大。

后来舒淇又遇见了导演侯孝贤，两个人不是第一次合作，但是却是第一次合作拍电影。拍摄完《千禧曼波》舒淇感悟良多，这部电影对她的影响不小，让她懂得了一个演员真正的含义。

后来两个人合作的电影《最好的时光》，将舒淇送上了金马奖的领奖台。最后，舒淇这一生取得了不小成就，但是她的成名之路，一点都不平凡。#影视杂谈##八卦手册##舒淇#